Sunday, August 30, 2009

2010 City Budget, Temporary Bond Refinancing (EDA) and District Energy System Bonding Options

2010 City Budget Department Budget Meetings

Mayor Hakes, Councilors Kennedy and Sivertson, Mike Roth and Kim Dunsmoor met all of Friday morning on August 28 with City Department Heads to discuss 2010 Budget Requests.

  • Lenny Bloomquist presented the Buildings, Streets & Roads proposed budget. The need for capital planning to eventually replace the Street Sweeper and Mini Dump Truck was discussed.

  • Benny Silence presented the proposed budget for the Fire and Medical Services Departments. The need for capital planning to replace the Tanker was discussed.

  • Dave Tersteeg presented the proposed budget for the Rec Park including the Recreation General Fund, Swimming Pool and Boat Harbor. A second meeting with Tersteeg to discuss both Expenditures and Revenues will be scheduled. The increasing cost to operate the Swimming Pool continues to be of serious concern.

The Council will set the preliminary levy for the City on September 9.

City Council and County Board Meet with Ehlers & Associates

The City Council, County Board, City Staff, EDA Director Matt Geretschlaeger and EDA Board Chair Mike Litfin met the afternoon of August 28 to discuss refinancing what has come to be known as the EDA Bond and also discuss options for financing a Biomass Facility.

Refinancing General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds

Just about 3 years ago (January 2007) the City of Grand Marais issued $1,630,000 General Obligation (G.O.) Temporary Improvements Bonds to provide financing for the Sewer, Water & Street infrastructure improvements in the EDA Business Park. The plan at that time was for the EDA to sell lots in the Business Park and repay the City $60,000 for each lot sold until the debt was repaid. Lot sales have not occurred as planned and the EDA is unable to repay the City.

This 3-year G.O. Temporary Improvement Bond is now due in January 2010 and the City is responsible for this payment. Ehlers & Associates has provided the City with options for refinancing this Temporary Bond including a 2nd G.O. Temporary Improvement Bond or a 15 or 20-year G.O. Improvement Bond. Although further information needs to be gathered before any final decision is made, the City is leaning toward the 20-year G.O. Improvement Bond which means an average annual debt service cost to the City of $125,000.

The City has again requested that the EDA establish a comprehensive plan for the Business Park focusing on lots sales. They have also asked the EDA to explore other options to repay the debt. In the meantime, the City is on the hook for repayment.

District Energy System Bonding Options

The City also requested that Ehlers & Associates provide information on bonding authority for a District Energy System, aka Biomass Facility. (See Mayor Minutes July 8 entry for a brief history of this project. )

Ehlers & Associates first noted that State Law gives the City primary authority for a District Energy System, but that the County may also operate a District Energy system within the City. They also clarified that financing options for the Biomass Facility assumed that no 1% Local Options Sales Tax funding would be available for this project.

Bonding options for a Biomass Facility include, but are not limited to:

  1. Utility Revenue Bonds--Ehlers & Associates have not sold Utility Revenue Bonds for a Biomass Facility, nor are they aware of any that have been sold for this purpose. However, they believe that with a strong enough business plan it is possible. They also noted that a more favorable interest rate could be achieved by backing the bond with the local electric utility revenues. A $6,000,000 bond at 6% over 20 years would result in an annual principal and interest payment of ~$523,100.
  2. General Obligation Improvement Bond--Ehlers & Associates did not recommend this type of bond, but noted that it could be used in combination with other types of funding.

A brief discussion of the Biomass Facility project ensued. Mayor Hakes was clear that a detailed and credible Business Plan--including a financial & cash flow analysis, debt repayment, risk analysis and technical analysis--must be done before she will support the creation of this new utility for the City.